McGill.CA / Science / Department of Physics

RQMP Research Seminar

New experimental signatures of the pseudogap phase in cuprates

Louis Taillefer

Département de physique
Université de Sherbrooke

Phase diagram of cuprates
Phase diagram of cuprates. In zero field, superconductivity exists in a dome below Tc (dashed line). When it is removed by a magnetic field, various underlying ground states are revealed: doped Mott insulator with antiferromagnetic order (AF, brown); pseudogap phase below a temperature T* (PG, yellow), ending at a T = 0 critical point p* (red dot); charge-density wave phase (CDW, blue), contained inside the PG phase; a strange metal region just above p*, which gives way to a Fermi liquid state (FL, gray region) at highest doping.

The pseudogap phase of cuprate superconductors is arguably the most enigmatic phase of quantum matter. We aim to shed new light on this phase by investigating the non-superconducting ground state of several cuprate materials at low temperature, by suppressing superconductivity with a magnetic field [1].

Hall effect and thermal conductivity measurements across the pseudogap critical doping p* reveal a sharp drop in carrier density n from n = 1 + p above p* to n = p below p* [2], signaling a major transformation of the Fermi surface. From specific heat measurements, we observe the classic thermodynamic signatures of quantum criticality: the electronic specific heat shows a sharp peak at p*, where it varies in temperature as ­ T logT [3]. At p* and just above, the electrical resistivity is linear in T at low T, with an inelastic scattering rate that obeys the Planckian limit [4]. Finally, the pseudogap phase is found to have a large negative thermal Hall conductivity, as a result of phonons acquiring chirality in a magnetic field [5].

Understanding the mechanisms responsible for these various new signatures will help elucidate the nature of the pseudogap phase.

References:
[1] Proust & Taillefer, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 10, 409 (2019).
[2] Badoux et al., Nature 531, 210 (2016); Collignon et al., Phys. Rev. B 95, 224517 (2017).
[3] Michon et al., Nature 567, 218 (2019).
[4] Legros et al., Nat. Phys. 15, 142 (2019); Grissonnanche et al., Nature 595, 667 (2021).
[5] Grissonnanche et al., Nature 571, 376 (2019); Nat. Phys. 16, 1108 (2020).

Thursday, December 2nd 2021, 10:30
Tele-seminar